Reaction path analysis in methanol to olefins conversion

  1. Reaction path analysis in methanol to olefins conversion

    16NANO05 / Nanoporous materials
    Promotor(en): J.W. Thybaut, V. Van Speybroeck / Begeleider(s): K. De Wispelaere, S.D. Pressinger

    Rapidly declining fossil reserves have urged the exploration of alternative feeds and corresponding routes towards similar chemicals and fuels. Methanol to olefins conversion is such a proven technology which is, at present, operated on the industrial scale. Methanol is contacted with an acid catalyst that provokes carbon-carbon bond coupling and formation of heavier hydrocarbons, c.q., alkenes. Apart from the acidity, the pore topology, i.e., the framework type, of the catalyst used is one of the determining factors for the activity and, maybe even more importantly, the selectivity. Indeed, catalyst performance is deemed to be governed by so-called hydrocarbon pool species which undergo methylation, isomerization and dealkylation reactions. The rather bulky nature of these species explains the specific reactions they can be subject to and the corresponding preferential product formation while that of others is sterically hindered. An alternative mechanism, i.e., alkene homologation, typically prevails when the hydrocarbon pool mechanism experiences severe steric constraints or when the catalyst exhibits a mild acid strength.
    Both the Laboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT) and the Centre for Molecular Modelling (CMM) have a strong track record in methanol to olefins conversion. While the LCT has focused on microkinetic model development, i.e., expressing reaction rates in terms of elementary steps, in a top-down manner, the CMM has adopted a bottom-up approach starting from an ab initio based analysis of the reaction mechanism. In the present project, a synergy will be pursued by feeding the microkinetic model with ab initio based insight, c.q., parameter values. Depending on the interests of the student, this thesis may focus more on chemical intuitions or on governing physical interactions at the atomic scale.

    Program

    The assumptions as presently used in the microkinetic methanol to olefins conversion simulations [1,2] will be evaluated in view of the ab initio acquired insight in the reaction mechanism.[3] To this end results of high level static DFT calculations complemented with insights from molecular dynamics simulations will be compared to parameter estimates in the microkinetic model. The combined modeling approach should allow identifying relevant features that may need to be incorporated into the microkinetic model. It is expected to lead to extended reaction pathways involving parallel routes. A so-called ‘reaction pathway analysis’ will be used as a tool to distinguish the most relevant pathways from rather unimportant ones. The impact of the operating conditions such as temperature and feed composition on the reaction pathway analysis results should, of course, be kept in mind. In particular the influence of the zeolite topology will be assessed by comparing the ZSM-5 and ZSM-23 materials. Indeed, the reaction species are strongly influenced by topological aspects through weakly bonding interactions, such as hydrogen bridges and van der Waals forces.

    The LCT and CMM have ample experience and access to sufficient computational resources to execute this research project. The proposed topic is challenging and requires technical skills, creativity and chemical insight to tackle this problem from a molecular and microkinetic modeling viewpoint.

    Physics aspects: insights in atomic-scale interactions and use of quantum mechanical programs
    Engineering aspects: application to molecular reactions in nanoporous materials

  1. Study programme
    Master of Science in Engineering Physics [EMPHYS], Master of Science in Chemical Engineering [EMCHEM], Master of Science in Physics and Astronomy [CMFYST]
    Clusters
    For Engineering Physics students, this thesis is closely related to the cluster(s) NANO, MATERIALS
    Keywords
    Zeolites, Heterogeneous Catalysis, Chemical kinetics, Computational applications, microkinetic modeling
    References

    [1] Kumar, P.; Thybaut, J. W.; Svelle, S.; Olsbye, U.; Marin, G. B. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 1491-1507.

    [2] Kumar, P.; Thybaut, J. W.; Teketel, S.; Svelle, S.; Beato, P.; Olsbye, U.; Marin, G. B. Catal. Today 2013, 215, 224-232.

    [3] Hemelsoet, K.; Van der Mynsbrugge, J.; De Wispelaere, K.; Waroquier, M.; Van Speybroeck, V. ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 1526-1545.

Contact

Veronique Van Speybroeck
Kristof De Wispelaere